In a lab setting, we compared the effectiveness of 40% MEA triazine to Pro3® GT and Pro3® GT+ isolating
conditions to
determine breakover performance.
Proving that Pro3® GT is a direct substitute to triazine.
Develop a non-triazine based product with the same effectiveness as MEA triazine but not exposed to commodity pricing.
At approximately 70 minutes both GT and triazine began breakover. GT+ continued for an additional 30 minutes before breakover.
Solids formation: comparing triazine to GT/GT+ in overspent scenarios.
Additional product was added to the solution resulting in overspent scenario.
The consistency of the treated product was observed
Triazine thickened and became solid after 4 hours and stayed solid troughout the 30 day test period.
GT/GT+ remained in a liquid state for the entirety of the test.
Temperature stress test: comparing triazine to GT/GT+ in low and high temperatures.
Took neat and treated trials of triazine and GT/GT+ and exposed them to a wide temperature array.
The consistency of the treated product was observed:
Neat triazine solidified at 0 oF and the sample that was treated with triazine solidified at 50 oF.
GT/GT+ remained liquid and stable throughout the entire testing.
Replaced 40% MEA triazine at a Permian gas site—cutting usage by 45%, saving $3.8M annually, meeting pipeline specs, and eliminating…
Pro3® Nano solid catalyst achieved
Triazine replaced Sulfa-Check in a contact tower—achieving equal H2S removal with 50% less product, eliminating sulfur buildup, and removing the…