Why Choose Between Triazine and Non-Triazine?

When selecting an H2S scavenger whether a traditional triazine-based product, an alternative triazine formula, or a non-triazine solution—it’s important to carefully evaluate all available options. Different scavengers perform better under specific process conditions and applications, such as oil treatment, acid gas sweetening, or mercaptan odor removal. As our analysis will show, one may be better than the other depending on the specific conditions of what needs to be treated. Over the years, triazine-based treatment has been the go-to solution for many Producers, Midstreamers, and Refiners, and to a large extent it is still the go-to choice. But for some, implementing new technology such as non-triazine products has positively impacted their operations and has lowered their costs. Is one better than the other? That all depends on your use case and process conditions. Here you’ll find a brief description of both triazine and non-triazine alternatives to help inform you of the effective solutions on the market for your application.

Aspect Triazine Treatment Non-Triazine Treatment
Industry Usage Longtime go-to solution for Producers, Midstreamers, and Refiners Gaining adoption as new technology
Reliability Proven and still widely used Effective alternative depending on conditions
Impact on Operations Trusted but may have operational challenges (e.g., fouling, amine salts) Can positively impact operations, often lowering costs
Best Use Case Suited for many traditional applications Better fit in certain cases where triazine limitations matter
Key Consideration Still the default choice for many May be preferred when cost savings or refinery safety is a concern

What is Triazine Treatment?

Triazine for H2S scavenging is an established and reliable chemical reaction that is employed in the Oil & Gas industry to remove H2S from gas streams. The H2S scavenging can be done via direct injection in pipelines with fog nozzles, wet scrubbers, or bubble towers at either wells, central batteries or midstream systems. The triazine H2S scavenger technique is a cost-effective solution for gaseous streams with sulfur loading of less than 1000 lbs. per day. However, consider alternative catalyst systems for extended long-term use and savings. It typically reduces H2S concentrations to <4 ppm and partially removes several light mercaptans (methyl, ethyl, and propyl). Triazine’s ability to remove H2S is affected by various parameters, including temperature, pH, contact duration, and natural gas composition. The final product is water soluble and is usually discharged in the produced water tanks and commercial saltwater disposal facilities.


It is important to note that using triazine as an H2S scavenger may cause fouling from the polymerization of dithiazine in contact towers, scrubbers and/or pipelines. Careful use and monitoring of the triazine solution is needed to ensure smooth operation. Q2 Technologies has been manufacturing traditional triazine blends for decades and also offers expertise in developing unique formulas for special cases.

Check out this case study:

What is Non-Triazine Treatment?

IMG_9477-768x576

Even though triazine is a well-trusted solution, many companies have chosen non-triazine-based scavengers as alternatives for use in crude oil applications. One of the main characteristics of our non-triazine product, Pro3®, is a non-amine and non-glyoxal technology, making it safe for refineries and pipelines. If left unchecked, Amine salts that form from spent triazine can ultimately cause damage to the top stacks of a refinery when heated to >500 °F. Many refiners in the US Gulf Coast and overseas monitor amine content and require traders and midstream companies to use vetted non-triazine chemistries.

Advantages of Non-Triazine H2S Scavengers

Producers and Midstream companies alike have found success with our non-triazine products:

  • The quality of the oil is upgraded when H2S content is reduced.
  • Safer environment for all personnel on-site.
  • Infrastructure and equipment will last longer now that corrosion caused by H2S has been neutralized.
  • Our non-triazine scavengers are not based on commodity-priced products, so our prices are protected and are less impacted by external factors such as freezes and industrial raw material shortages.

Field Results and Performance

Our non-triazine H2S removal technology has proven to reduce chemical use up to 50-75% as compared to triazine. This definitely does not mean that triazine should always be replaced by non-triazine, rather, Q2 Technologies can assist you from a technical, engineering, and commercial viewpoint. Each application is different and needs to be carefully analyzed to determine the treatment product.

Triazine vs. Non-Triazine: Key Considerations

In conclusion, both triazine based H2S scavenger and-non triazine H2S scavenger options have their benefits and are the go-to alternatives for oil and gas treatment. However, one may be better than the other depending on the specific characteristics of the product that needs to be treated. For more information on triazine-based scavengers for natural gas operations, check out our detailed overview here. If you’re looking for the right H2S scavenger solution for your company, feel free to contact us! You can also read more about how switching to Pro3® can be the game-changer for your operations in our detailed comparison of triazine versus non-triazine treatments here


Sources:


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1875510017304559

Why Choose Between Triazine and Non-Triazine?

When selecting an H2S scavenger whether a traditional triazine-based product, an alternative triazine formula, or a non-triazine solution—it’s important to carefully evaluate all available options. Different scavengers perform better under specific process conditions and applications, such as oil treatment, acid gas sweetening, or mercaptan odor removal. As our analysis will show, one may be better than the other depending on the specific conditions of what needs to be treated. Over the years, triazine-based treatment has been the go-to solution for many Producers, Midstreamers, and Refiners, and to a large extent it is still the go-to choice. But for some, implementing new technology such as non-triazine products has positively impacted their operations and has lowered their costs. Is one better than the other? That all depends on your use case and process conditions. Here you’ll find a brief description of both triazine and non-triazine alternatives to help inform you of the effective solutions on the market for your application.

Aspect Triazine Treatment Non-Triazine Treatment
Industry Usage Longtime go-to solution for Producers, Midstreamers, and Refiners Gaining adoption as new technology
Reliability Proven and still widely used Effective alternative depending on conditions
Impact on Operations Trusted but may have operational challenges (e.g., fouling, amine salts) Can positively impact operations, often lowering costs
Best Use Case Suited for many traditional applications Better fit in certain cases where triazine limitations matter
Key Consideration Still the default choice for many May be preferred when cost savings or refinery safety is a concern

What is Triazine Treatment?

Triazine for H2S scavenging is an established and reliable chemical reaction that is employed in the Oil & Gas industry to remove H2S from gas streams. The H2S scavenging can be done via direct injection in pipelines with fog nozzles, wet scrubbers, or bubble towers at either wells, central batteries or midstream systems. The triazine H2S scavenger technique is a cost-effective solution for gaseous streams with sulfur loading of less than 1000 lbs. per day. However, consider alternative catalyst systems for extended long-term use and savings. It typically reduces H2S concentrations to <4 ppm and partially removes several light mercaptans (methyl, ethyl, and propyl). Triazine’s ability to remove H2S is affected by various parameters, including temperature, pH, contact duration, and natural gas composition. The final product is water soluble and is usually discharged in the produced water tanks and commercial saltwater disposal facilities.


It is important to note that using triazine as an H2S scavenger may cause fouling from the polymerization of dithiazine in contact towers, scrubbers and/or pipelines. Careful use and monitoring of the triazine solution is needed to ensure smooth operation. Q2 Technologies has been manufacturing traditional triazine blends for decades and also offers expertise in developing unique formulas for special cases.

Check out this case study:

What is Non-Triazine Treatment?

IMG_9477-768x576

Even though triazine is a well-trusted solution, many companies have chosen non-triazine-based scavengers as alternatives for use in crude oil applications. One of the main characteristics of our non-triazine product, Pro3®, is a non-amine and non-glyoxal technology, making it safe for refineries and pipelines. If left unchecked, Amine salts that form from spent triazine can ultimately cause damage to the top stacks of a refinery when heated to >500 °F. Many refiners in the US Gulf Coast and overseas monitor amine content and require traders and midstream companies to use vetted non-triazine chemistries.

Advantages of Non-Triazine H2S Scavengers

Producers and Midstream companies alike have found success with our non-triazine products:

  • The quality of the oil is upgraded when H2S content is reduced.
  • Safer environment for all personnel on-site.
  • Infrastructure and equipment will last longer now that corrosion caused by H2S has been neutralized.
  • Our non-triazine scavengers are not based on commodity-priced products, so our prices are protected and are less impacted by external factors such as freezes and industrial raw material shortages.

Field Results and Performance

Our non-triazine H2S removal technology has proven to reduce chemical use up to 50-75% as compared to triazine. This definitely does not mean that triazine should always be replaced by non-triazine, rather, Q2 Technologies can assist you from a technical, engineering, and commercial viewpoint. Each application is different and needs to be carefully analyzed to determine the treatment product.

Triazine vs. Non-Triazine: Key Considerations

In conclusion, both triazine based H2S scavenger and-non triazine H2S scavenger options have their benefits and are the go-to alternatives for oil and gas treatment. However, one may be better than the other depending on the specific characteristics of the product that needs to be treated. For more information on triazine-based scavengers for natural gas operations, check out our detailed overview here. If you’re looking for the right H2S scavenger solution for your company, feel free to contact us! You can also read more about how switching to Pro3® can be the game-changer for your operations in our detailed comparison of triazine versus non-triazine treatments here


Sources:


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1875510017304559

When introduced into a stream afflicted with H2S, the hemiformal decomposes to release formaldehyde, which then reacts with hydrogen sulfide to form stable, non-volatile byproducts such as thiomethylene glycol.  The reaction is typically fast and efficient, particularly in aqueous or mixed-phase environments. Unlike some traditional scavengers, hemiformal can maintain activity across a broad pH range and is less likely to generate problematic solids. When considering if hemiformal is the right product, certain operating conditions are reviewed, such as pH and temperature.

Heading 1

When introduced into a stream afflicted with H2S, the hemiformal decomposes to release formaldehyde, which then reacts with hydrogen sulfide to form stable, non-volatile byproducts such as thiomethylene glycol.  The reaction is typically fast and efficient, particularly in aqueous or mixed-phase environments. Unlike some traditional scavengers, hemiformal can maintain activity across a broad pH range and is less likely to generate problematic solids. When considering if hemiformal is the right product, certain operating conditions are reviewed, such as pH and temperature.

Heading 2

When introduced into a stream afflicted with H2S, the hemiformal decomposes to release formaldehyde, which then reacts with hydrogen sulfide to form stable, non-volatile byproducts such as thiomethylene glycol.  The reaction is typically fast and efficient, particularly in aqueous or mixed-phase environments. Unlike some traditional scavengers, hemiformal can maintain activity across a broad pH range and is less likely to generate problematic solids. When considering if hemiformal is the right product, certain operating conditions are reviewed, such as pH and temperature.

Heading 3

Heading 4

When introduced into a stream afflicted with H2S, the hemiformal decomposes to release formaldehyde, which then reacts with hydrogen sulfide to form stable, non-volatile byproducts such as thiomethylene glycol.  The reaction is typically fast and efficient, particularly in aqueous or mixed-phase environments. Unlike some traditional scavengers, hemiformal can maintain activity across a broad pH range and is less likely to generate problematic solids. When considering if hemiformal is the right product, certain operating conditions are reviewed, such as pH and temperature. 

Key Benefits:

  • Controlled formaldehyde release 
  • Lower vapor pressure and improved safety profile 
  • Broad applicability across liquid and gas-phase systems 
  • Reduced scaling in sour water stripping and other high-temp operations 
  • Hemiformal can make the scavenger safe for transport as it is a very stable compound 

Heading 5

Hemiformal is used in a variety of upstream and midstream applications, including: 

  • Gas sweetening systems 
  • Produced water treatment 
  • Crude oil storage and transport 
  • Sour water stripper overheads 
  • Temporary H2S mitigation during maintenance or turnaround

Its adaptability makes it especially useful in operations where system conditions fluctuate or where traditional triazine-based products may underperform. 

Heading 6

While hemiformal offers many advantages, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. The rate of formaldehyde release can vary depending on formulation and environmental conditions. Additionally, while safer than raw formaldehyde, hemiformal must still be handled with care and appropriate PPE. 

For optimal results, formulation expertise and application-specific customization are key—something we at Q2 Technologies excel at delivering. 

Related Blogs

Related Articles